Thursday, March 4, 2010

Palouse Brownfields Project underway

PALOUSE – Palouse is a town noted for its transformation from old and run-down, to clean and improved – a city the Washington State DOT awarded as the 2001 Best City Project winner for its main street enhancement efforts.  But one piece of Main Street property has yet to transform.

A sun-bleached sign touting the name “IMFAB” hangs above the entrance of the Old Palouse Producers building on Main Street across from the Post Office. Weeds grow through the cracked asphalt parking area in trails leading up to weathered and worn Caterpillar fork-lifts, one of them sporting a set of deflated tires and chipped yellow paint, flanking pallets of cinder-blocks that rest in front of the entrance to the old metal fabrication building.

Next door to the site is father-and-son-owned Bagott Motors.

Mike Bagott commented on the facility and its past.

“From a community perspective, even an empty lot would be better,” Bagott said.

The issue is the lack of site up-keep at the old Palouse Producers site, he said.

The site, like an estimated 450,000 others similar to it nationwide, is considered a brownfield site, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, and the City of Palouse is planning on changing that.

Brownfield sites are parcels of land assessed by the EPA as contaminated, hazardous or polluted. Old or abandoned gas and service stations, fertilizer distribution centers and bulk fuel stations from the 1950s often sit on these sites – in many cases in downtown areas and on main streets.

In response to the contaminated land, the EPA Brownfields Economic Redevelopment Initiative aims at strengthening local economies by helping communities clean-up and reuse brownfields sites. Projects typically include a study phase of the contamination or pollution at the site, a phase for devising a cleanup plan, a reuse plan, and finally implementation of clean-up and reuse.

“The point of the project is to address cleaning up these sites,” Palouse Brownfields Committee Chair Doug Willcox said. “The Brownfields projects are designed to restore these sites to contributing locations.”

To move the Brownfields project past the first stages, the state Department of Ecology awarded the City of Palouse with a $200,000 Integrated Planning Grant, or IPG. The city is using the IPG funds to devise a clean-up plan for contamination in the soil and ground water at the Palouse Producers site and a commercial reuse plan.

According to the May 2008 assessment of the site, researchers found petroleum, herbicide, pesticide, and manganese, which is found in unleaded gasoline, in the soil.

The Palouse Brownfield site’s history shows a pattern of uses free of any major contaminating presence until more recent years.

The May 2008 site assessment document for the project listed the earliest uses for the building in its nearly 120 years in use: a wagon wheel shop, butcher shop, general store, dentist office, stable and welding shop. In 1955, Conoco moved onto the site and constructed a service station with above ground service tanks to hold leaded gasoline.

According to the assessment, the contamination of the site only occurred sometime after 1977 when the owners at the time, Palouse Producers, operated a fertilizer distribution and bulk fuel facility.

Willcox said the contamination of the site came from mishandling the refueling of large delivery trucks while refueling from the large tanks in the mid ‘80s.

According to the assessment, the state Department of Ecology cited the Palouse Producers in 1985 for spills of petroleum and negligence leading to leaks into the Palouse River.

An active proponent of the Brownsfield project, Mayor Michael Echanove said no immediate threat to the health of the community is evident due to the sites contamination, despite the site’s close proximity to the Palouse River. Echanove said the cleanup still remains crucial to city improvement.

The May 2008 assessment listed costs involved with the actual cleanup of the site being an estimated $286,200 to be paid over five years in $54,000 installments, a price tag Echanove said some residents may be concerned with.

To cover those costs, Willcox said the city will look to acquire additional grant money from the DOE or EPA to help out.

The project has much of the town in support, Echanove said. “I wouldn’t say there is opposition.”

Currently, the Palouse Brownsfield Project is in the middle of the first step of the integrated planning process, Willcox said. Willcox said two approaches are being made -- one of them being the planning of the cleanup phase, and the other the planning of the economic development on the site.

In the City Hall office hangs an artist conception of possible commercial developments.

Echanove said one idea for future development of the site is a retail building featuring urban residences.

But for now, the facility remains stocked with metal fabrication supplies visible from the sidewalk and as a private storage building. Willcox said the current owner remains the Palouse Producers, a company that filed bankruptcy in 1986, and that possible acquisition of the site by the City would come later.

The current tenant John Sell declined to comment.

Meanwhile, many Palouse residence are looking forward to the future of the site.

Joyce Beeson, the City Clerk and Treasurer, said the project is a major source of pride in the community. “People are really proud of their little town now,” she added.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Notes from skype session with Michael Berens

1. Quantify the issue?

2. Potential change?

3. Good v. bad?

Outlined the story and fact-checked...no surprises to DSHS

No stealth reporting

Bullet-proof stories

look for advocates...

there are people who are deeply concerned about these issues...just as there are UFO experts out there who 'know their stuff' 

attornies

lawsuits

state ombudsman's office

Point of view journalism (investigative journalism)

not an advocate, but someone who sees something that needs to change

"he said, she said, now i'm gonna tell you who is lying."

He comes out with a thesis, present his case, then the reader is either going to believe him or not.

Newspapers don't want investigative reporters anymore:

almost a year on salary working on this story... forty or fifty people on this project...  Times didn't sell any advertisment based on this, it didn't make the paper any money... the job doesn't make sense economically.

People want that watchdog out there.

Questions for Michael Berens

How long did you work on this story?


How did you find out that this was going on?


What sort of feedback have you recieved from readers?


What was your plan in filing public records requests that you used? What did you look for first?


How did you get in-touch with those you interviewed/find out who to interview?



Thursday, February 18, 2010

The Safe Baby Bottle Act

OLYMPIA—Seattle resident Katalin Marky stood before the House committee and explained she had unknowingly exposed her unborn child to Bisphenol-A -- a result she said came from drinking from her polycarbonate water bottle containing the chemical during her pregnancy.

Marky gave her testimony Wednesday afternoon in a hearing conducted by the House Environmental Health Committee for Substitute Senate Bill 6248, a bill banning the production of BPA in bottles, cups and bowls meant for child use under the age of three.

Bisphenol-A, or BPA, is a type of material used to harden plastic used since the 1930s. While the issue of whether BPA is safe or not continues to be researched, legislators are currently seeking its regulation. What is garnering the interest of politicians in this chemical is its usage.

In a telephone interview, bill sponsor Senator Keiser, D-Kent, said BPA is still used in baby bottles, sippy cups and cereal bowls – items linked directly to use by young children. Researchers remain concerned that BPA leaks into food and beverage when heated or used repeatedly.

Under the guidelines of SSB 6248, manufacturers of products using BPA will be required to notify retailers, recall their products, reimburse retailers and discontinue production of products containing BPA.

According to the bill, failure to meet those criteria will result in a $5,000 civil penalty for a first offense and $10,000 for repeat offenses. If the bill is passed, the bill will take effect July 1, 2011.

The public hearing began with opening remarks by Sen. Keiser.

“This is an incredibly important issue – it’s a developing issue,” she said.

Sen. Keiser said the bill is brought up as “a cautionary principle,” especially in regard to the safety of young children and infants.

Dr. Jim White, a toxicologist at the Washington State Department of Health, spoke in favor of the substitute bill.

White said current research shows an uncertainty to the safety of BPA, and that in research done on current, typical exposure to BPA, there is some concern for the health of infants and fetuses.

“One of the main principles of public health is that it’s best to prevent health problems before they occur,” White said.

According to White, Connecticut and Minnesota have also created initiatives banning or placing restrictions on BPA use, especially in baby bottles and sippy cups.

Carol Kraege, Toxics Policy Coordinator for Washington, also discussed the bill as a preemptive safety measure toward the BPA issue. “It’s prudent and appropriate to move away from it [BPA],” she said.

Jim Connelly of the Lodi Water Company, and representing the Northwest Bottled Water Association in Spokane, expressed several concerns to the substitute bill and an amendment proposed by Representative Matt Shea that adds “sports water bottles” to the list of banned products carrying BPA.

Connelly said he is concerned that consumers will no longer purchase large water containers, containers that are not being reheated or evenunder the same scrutiny as sports bottles, because of the use of “water” in the term “sports water bottles.”

Consumers are not going to believe that BPA issues are just based on the small water bottles and sales would ultimately decrease, Connelly said.

“It would ruin my business and I would close my doors,” Connelly added.

Whereas sports bottle companies are already making the switch to BPA-free products, Connelly said the three- and five-gallon water containers that are integral to his company are products water industry experts are yet unable to find viable container alternatives for.

Grant Nelson, Government Affairs Director for the Association of Washington Business, also disagreed with the water bottle terminology prescribed by the amendment.

Nelson said alternatives to using the terminology should be sought.

Representative Christine Rolfes, D-Bainbridge Island, posed a question to Nelson before he finished testifying: “Those thermoses that we pack our kids hot lunches in -- do they have BPA in them?”

“I have no idea,” Nelson replied. “I hope not.”